What is the process called when Franchesca submits her research findings for evaluation by fellow scientists?

The process referred to when research findings are submitted for evaluation by fellow scientists is known as the peer-review process. This procedure is a critical step in academic publishing, wherein experts in the relevant field evaluate the submitted work to ensure it meets the necessary standards of quality, validity, and contribution to the field before it is published. Peer review serves to validate research, identify any flaws or biases, and ensure that the methodology and conclusions drawn are sound.

Thematic analysis, on the other hand, refers to a method used to analyze qualitative data by identifying and interpreting patterns or themes within the data. Systematic review involves a structured approach to reviewing existing literature on a particular topic to synthesize findings and draw conclusions from a multitude of studies. Meta-analysis, meanwhile, is a quantitative technique used to combine results from different studies to arrive at a unified conclusion, often focusing on statistical outcomes. Each of these processes plays a distinct role within research methodology, but they do not specifically involve the act of submitting findings for the evaluation by peers in the way that the peer-review process does.