Which of the following is NOT a reason why basing one's conclusions on research is superior to intuition?

Basing conclusions on research is regarded as superior to intuition for several important reasons, and identifying why one of the options does not fit into this framework is key for understanding research methods.

The statement that intuition always leads to correct conclusions is the one that does not align with the principles of sound research practices. Intuition is often influenced by personal experiences, emotions, and cognitive biases, which can lead to incorrect assumptions and conclusions. In contrast, research is designed to minimize these subjective influences.

Research is characterized by objectivity, meaning that it strives to measure and analyze data without personal bias. It employs systematic methodologies that are grounded in scientific rigor, thus making findings more credible and reliable than those derived purely from intuition.

Moreover, research includes methodologies that are designed to minimize bias, ensuring that results are not skewed by researchers' personal beliefs or expectations. It also emphasizes the importance of replicable results, allowing other researchers to duplicate studies and verify findings, which strengthens the validity of the conclusions drawn.

Therefore, while intuition can be a quick way to arrive at a conclusion, it lacks the structured, systematic approach offered by research, making the notion that intuition always leads to correct conclusions a flawed premise.