Which of these is NOT a characteristic of an edited book?

The correct answer is that the peer-review process for edited books is typically not more rigorous than for journals. In general, journal articles often undergo a more thorough and standardized peer-review process due to the pressure of maintaining consistency and quality in academic publishing. Journals usually have specific guidelines and criteria that must be met for acceptance, whereas edited books can vary significantly in their review processes. Some chapters in edited volumes may be subject to peer review, but this is not uniform across all edited books, which allows for more variation in the level of scrutiny each chapter receives.

In contrast, edited books often bring together chapters from various authors, showcasing a range of expertise and perspectives on a single topic, thereby enriching the discourse within the field. They also maintain focus on a central theme, ensuring that the collected works relate closely to one another, contributing to the depth of discussion around that topic. This diversity of perspectives in edited volumes serves to offer a more rounded understanding of complex issues, making them valuable resources in academic settings.